#2
Positie
5
Punten
2
Gewonnen
2
Verloren
50%
Winst %
62%
Sets gewonnen
1
Van Gucht Ilke P50 (9 matchen)
+7
(8W–1V)
89%
Sets +7
Games +45
2
Moens KIMO Kim P50 (7 matchen)
+5
(6W–1V)
86%
Sets +5
Games +34
3
Ysewijn Cindy P50 (6 matchen)
+4
(5W–1V)
83%
Sets +4
Games +19
4
Van De Velde Evelien P50 (7 matchen)
+1
(4W–3V)
57%
Sets +1
Games +13
5
Stevens Nel P50 (8 matchen)
0
(4W–4V)
50%
Sets 0
Games +7
6
De Brandt Sofie P50 (7 matchen)
-1
(3W–4V)
43%
Sets -1
Games -3
7
Bieseman Tersya P50 (2 matchen)
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -6
8
Van De Weghe Eline P50 (2 matchen)
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -13
| Speler | Klass. | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Van Gucht Ilke | P50 | 9 | +7 (8–1) | 89% | +7 (8–1) | +45 (78–33) | — |
| Moens KIMO Kim | P50 | 7 | +5 (6–1) | 86% | +5 (6–1) | +34 (57–23) | — |
| Ysewijn Cindy | P50 | 6 | +4 (5–1) | 83% | +4 (5–1) | +19 (46–27) | — |
| Van De Velde Evelien | P50 | 7 | +1 (4–3) | 57% | +1 (4–3) | +13 (50–37) | — |
| Stevens Nel | P50 | 8 | 0 (4–4) | 50% | 0 (4–4) | +7 (55–48) | — |
| De Brandt Sofie | P50 | 7 | -1 (3–4) | 43% | -1 (3–4) | -3 (43–46) | — |
| Bieseman Tersya | P50 | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -6 (12–18) | — |
| Van De Weghe Eline | P50 | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -13 (5–18) | — |
| Totaal | 48 | +12 (30–18) | 62% | +12 (30–18) | +96 (346–250) | — |
+3
(3W–0V)
100%
Sets +3
Games +20
+3
(3W–0V)
100%
Sets +3
Games +20
+2
(2W–0V)
100%
Sets +2
Games +10
+1
(2W–1V)
67%
Sets +1
Games +10
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +7
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +5
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +4
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +3
-1
(1W–2V)
33%
Sets -1
Games +2
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -1
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -5
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -6
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -8
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -13
| Duo | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Moens KIMO Kim / Van Gucht Ilke | 3 | +3 (3–0) | 100% | +3 (3–0) | +20 (27–7) | — |
| Moens KIMO Kim / Ysewijn Cindy | 3 | +3 (3–0) | 100% | +3 (3–0) | +20 (27–7) | — |
| Van De Velde Evelien / Van Gucht Ilke | 2 | +2 (2–0) | 100% | +2 (2–0) | +10 (18–8) | — |
| Stevens Nel / Van Gucht Ilke | 3 | +1 (2–1) | 67% | +1 (2–1) | +10 (24–14) | — |
| Stevens Nel / Van De Velde Evelien | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +7 (9–2) | — |
| De Brandt Sofie / Van Gucht Ilke | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +5 (9–4) | — |
| Stevens Nel / Ysewijn Cindy | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +4 (9–5) | — |
| De Brandt Sofie / Ysewijn Cindy | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +3 (9–6) | — |
| De Brandt Sofie / Van De Velde Evelien | 3 | -1 (1–2) | 33% | -1 (1–2) | +2 (20–18) | — |
| Bieseman Tersya / Stevens Nel | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -1 (8–9) | — |
| Bieseman Tersya / Van De Weghe Eline | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -5 (4–9) | — |
| Moens KIMO Kim / Van De Velde Evelien | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -6 (3–9) | — |
| Van De Weghe Eline / Ysewijn Cindy | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -8 (1–9) | — |
| De Brandt Sofie / Stevens Nel | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -13 (5–18) | — |
| Totaal | 24 | +6 (15–9) | 62% | +6 (15–9) | +48 (173–125) | — |
zo 22 mrt 2026 Uit
Verloren
BOTZ PADEL A🏆
3–3
T.C. HOF TER BURST B
zo 29 mrt 2026 Uit
Verloren
PADELSCHOOL OPDEFORTEN A🏆
4–2
T.C. HOF TER BURST B
do 9 apr 2026 Thuis
Gewonnen
T.C. HOF TER BURST B🏆
4–2
De Pelgrim Padelclub A
zo 19 apr 2026 Thuis
Gewonnen
T.C. HOF TER BURST B🏆
6–0
Reinaert Tennis & Padelclub Lokeren vzw A
zo 26 apr 2026 Uit
Gepland
PADEL POLDERGOTE A
vs
T.C. HOF TER BURST B