#4
Positie
2
Punten
1
Gewonnen
2
Verloren
33%
Winst %
39%
Sets gewonnen
1
Winderickx Nathan P100 (3 matchen)
+1
(2W–1V)
67%
Sets +1
Games +2
2
De Clerck Emiel P100 (8 matchen)
0
(4W–4V)
50%
Sets 0
Games 0
3
Decraene Emile P200 (6 matchen)
0
(3W–3V)
50%
Sets 0
Games -3
4
Vandenbroele Quinten P100 (4 matchen)
-2
(1W–3V)
25%
Sets -2
Games -6
5
Verhelst Nicola P100 (6 matchen)
-2
(2W–4V)
33%
Sets -2
Games -15
6
Tack Sebastien P100 (2 matchen)
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -16
7
Catry Joachim P100 (7 matchen)
-3
(2W–5V)
29%
Sets -3
Games -20
| Speler | Klass. | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Winderickx Nathan | P100 | 3 | +1 (2–1) | 67% | +1 (2–1) | +2 (22–20) | — |
| De Clerck Emiel | P100 | 8 | 0 (4–4) | 50% | 0 (4–4) | 0 (52–52) | — |
| Decraene Emile | P200 | 6 | 0 (3–3) | 50% | 0 (3–3) | -3 (37–40) | — |
| Vandenbroele Quinten | P100 | 4 | -2 (1–3) | 25% | -2 (1–3) | -6 (25–31) | — |
| Verhelst Nicola | P100 | 6 | -2 (2–4) | 33% | -2 (2–4) | -15 (27–42) | — |
| Tack Sebastien | P100 | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -16 (2–18) | — |
| Catry Joachim | P100 | 7 | -3 (2–5) | 29% | -3 (2–5) | -20 (35–55) | — |
| Totaal | 36 | -8 (14–22) | 39% | -8 (14–22) | -58 (200–258) | — |
+2
(2W–0V)
100%
Sets +2
Games +8
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +6
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +2
0
(1W–1V)
50%
Sets 0
Games 0
0
(1W–1V)
50%
Sets 0
Games -1
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -2
-1
(1W–2V)
33%
Sets -1
Games -3
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -4
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -7
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -9
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -9
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -10
| Duo | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Decraene Emile / De Clerck Emiel | 2 | +2 (2–0) | 100% | +2 (2–0) | +8 (18–10) | — |
| Decraene Emile / Verhelst Nicola | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +6 (9–3) | — |
| Catry Joachim / Winderickx Nathan | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +2 (9–7) | — |
| Vandenbroele Quinten / Winderickx Nathan | 2 | 0 (1–1) | 50% | 0 (1–1) | 0 (13–13) | — |
| Catry Joachim / De Clerck Emiel | 2 | 0 (1–1) | 50% | 0 (1–1) | -1 (11–12) | — |
| Catry Joachim / Vandenbroele Quinten | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -2 (7–9) | — |
| De Clerck Emiel / Verhelst Nicola | 3 | -1 (1–2) | 33% | -1 (1–2) | -3 (18–21) | — |
| De Clerck Emiel / Vandenbroele Quinten | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -4 (5–9) | — |
| Decraene Emile / Tack Sebastien | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -7 (2–9) | — |
| Tack Sebastien / Verhelst Nicola | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -9 (0–9) | — |
| Catry Joachim / Verhelst Nicola | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -9 (0–9) | — |
| Decraene Emile / Catry Joachim | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -10 (8–18) | — |
| Totaal | 18 | -4 (7–11) | 39% | -4 (7–11) | -29 (100–129) | — |
vr 20 mrt 2026 Uit
Gewonnen
BRUGHIA C
1–5
🏆TENNISVERENIGING LOPPEM C
vr 27 mrt 2026 Thuis
Verloren
TENNISVERENIGING LOPPEM C
1–5
🏆Ostend Tennis&Padel Club F
vr 17 apr 2026 Uit
Verloren
K.G. WITTE BEER A🏆
5–1
TENNISVERENIGING LOPPEM C
wo 22 apr 2026 Uit
Gepland
T.C. LOGAN E
vs
TENNISVERENIGING LOPPEM C
vr 24 apr 2026 Thuis
Gepland
TENNISVERENIGING LOPPEM C
vs
GHISTELEHOF SPORTCOMPLEX B
Bron: Tennis en Padel Vlaanderen
· laatste update: 18/04/2026 10:45