#2
Positie
4
Punten
2
Gewonnen
1
Verloren
67%
Winst %
56%
Sets gewonnen
1
Bultiauw Nathalie P200 (5 matchen)
+3
(4W–1V)
80%
Sets +3
Games +15
2
Vanderhaeghe Philip P100 (2 matchen)
+2
(2W–0V)
100%
Sets +2
Games +12
3
Lamote Gilles P100 (4 matchen)
+2
(3W–1V)
75%
Sets +2
Games +10
4
Nechelput Wout P300 (6 matchen)
+2
(4W–2V)
67%
Sets +2
Games +10
5
Claus Cedric P200 (2 matchen)
+2
(2W–0V)
100%
Sets +2
Games +10
6
Lafaut Matthias P200 (6 matchen)
0
(3W–3V)
50%
Sets 0
Games -2
7
Vanlangenhove Veerle P200 (1 matchen)
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -5
8
Vandervorst Steven P200 (2 matchen)
-2
(0W–2V)
0%
Sets -2
Games -9
9
Vermeersch Sebastien P200 (4 matchen)
-2
(1W–3V)
25%
Sets -2
Games -10
10
Rogiest Frederique P200 (4 matchen)
-2
(1W–3V)
25%
Sets -2
Games -11
| Speler | Klass. | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bultiauw Nathalie | P200 | 5 | +3 (4–1) | 80% | +3 (4–1) | +15 (41–26) | — |
| Vanderhaeghe Philip | P100 | 2 | +2 (2–0) | 100% | +2 (2–0) | +12 (18–6) | — |
| Lamote Gilles | P100 | 4 | +2 (3–1) | 75% | +2 (3–1) | +10 (34–24) | — |
| Nechelput Wout | P300 | 6 | +2 (4–2) | 67% | +2 (4–2) | +10 (42–32) | — |
| Claus Cedric | P200 | 2 | +2 (2–0) | 100% | +2 (2–0) | +10 (18–8) | — |
| Lafaut Matthias | P200 | 6 | 0 (3–3) | 50% | 0 (3–3) | -2 (45–47) | — |
| Vanlangenhove Veerle | P200 | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -5 (4–9) | — |
| Vandervorst Steven | P200 | 2 | -2 (0–2) | 0% | -2 (0–2) | -9 (9–18) | — |
| Vermeersch Sebastien | P200 | 4 | -2 (1–3) | 25% | -2 (1–3) | -10 (23–33) | — |
| Rogiest Frederique | P200 | 4 | -2 (1–3) | 25% | -2 (1–3) | -11 (22–33) | — |
| Totaal | 36 | +4 (20–16) | 56% | +4 (20–16) | +20 (256–236) | — |
+3
(3W–0V)
100%
Sets +3
Games +17
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +7
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +5
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +5
+1
(2W–1V)
67%
Sets +1
Games +3
+1
(1W–0V)
100%
Sets +1
Games +2
0
(1W–1V)
50%
Sets 0
Games -1
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -3
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -4
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -4
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -5
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -5
-1
(0W–1V)
0%
Sets -1
Games -7
| Duo | M | W–V | Win% | Sets | Games | 3-sets |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nechelput Wout / Bultiauw Nathalie | 3 | +3 (3–0) | 100% | +3 (3–0) | +17 (27–10) | — |
| Lamote Gilles / Vanderhaeghe Philip | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +7 (9–2) | — |
| Claus Cedric / Vanderhaeghe Philip | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +5 (9–4) | — |
| Nechelput Wout / Claus Cedric | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +5 (9–4) | — |
| Lafaut Matthias / Lamote Gilles | 3 | +1 (2–1) | 67% | +1 (2–1) | +3 (25–22) | — |
| Bultiauw Nathalie / Lafaut Matthias | 1 | +1 (1–0) | 100% | +1 (1–0) | +2 (9–7) | — |
| Rogiest Frederique / Vermeersch Sebastien | 2 | 0 (1–1) | 50% | 0 (1–1) | -1 (14–15) | — |
| Lafaut Matthias / Rogiest Frederique | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -3 (6–9) | — |
| Bultiauw Nathalie / Vandervorst Steven | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -4 (5–9) | — |
| Lafaut Matthias / Vermeersch Sebastien | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -4 (5–9) | — |
| Nechelput Wout / Vanlangenhove Veerle | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -5 (4–9) | — |
| Vandervorst Steven / Vermeersch Sebastien | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -5 (4–9) | — |
| Nechelput Wout / Rogiest Frederique | 1 | -1 (0–1) | 0% | -1 (0–1) | -7 (2–9) | — |
| Totaal | 18 | +2 (10–8) | 56% | +2 (10–8) | +10 (128–118) | — |
za 21 mrt 2026 Thuis
Gewonnen
K.G. WITTE BEER E🏆
3–3
Ostend Tennis&Padel Club A
za 28 mrt 2026 Thuis
Gewonnen
K.G. WITTE BEER E🏆
4–2
T.C. ST-MICHIELS D
za 18 apr 2026 Uit
Verloren
T.C. LOGAN C🏆
3–3
K.G. WITTE BEER E
za 25 apr 2026 Thuis
Gepland
K.G. WITTE BEER E
vs
T.C. PARC ASTRID D
za 2 mei 2026 Uit
Gepland
K.T.C. AZALEA A
vs
K.G. WITTE BEER E
Bron: Tennis en Padel Vlaanderen
· laatste update: 19/04/2026 08:06